In preparation for my MBA international graduate seminar in
Europe this spring, I have been doing a fair share of research into possible
project ideas. One of the main criteria
for this project is that it connects a U.S. company with one we will visit
while in Linz, Austria or Prague, Czech Republic. Skoda is a subsidiary of Volkswagen and one
of the companies we will visit while in the Czech Republic. I decided to use this company as the basis
for my report since I have some experience in the automotive industry as a past
co-op engineer for BMW. I also decided
to tie that company to a domestic one for a cross-culture perspective. Toyota has its largest North American
manufacturing plant just a short distance south of Cincinnati in Georgetown,
KY. With such a close proximity, I
thought this would be a prime choice for the second company in the pair used for
my project. After doing some research of
Toyota online and submitting a “contact” petition to one of their
representatives, I took the prerogative of scheduling a plant tour to see what
the American auto manufacturing scene was like.
Front Entrance of TMMK |
Today I went down to Georgetown with a fellow engineering
classmate for a 2pm plant tour. The tour
lasted about two hours and gave us a great view of the company and its
manufacturing processes. On our way to
Gate 2 where the visitor center was located, we were able to see the sprawling
size of the plant surrounding us. Toyota
Motor Manufacturing Kentucky (TMMK) takes up 1300 acres of land and employs
over 7,490 people. They produce the
Camry four door sedan, Avalon sedan, Sienna minivan four-cylinder and V6 engines,
and other Toyota auto parts. Their production
capacity is nearly 500,000 vehicles per year (roughly 2000 cars per working
day).
TMMK Plant |
The sheer size of the operation became even clearer once we
entered their visitor center. I know of
few companies who have such an elaborate and professional visitor center. The plant’s latest model cars were on display
in the lobby, along with some of their engines on stands. Brochures were also available explaining
everything from the cars produced to Toyota’s environmental protection
initiatives. A separate part of the
center was dedicated solely towards explaining the Toyota Production System
(TPS). Just before we began the plant
tour, we watched a short eight minute video on the plant’s history and current
state. It began with the story of its
groundbreaking in 1985 when the Japanese auto producer decided to take an
investment risk by creating the Kentucky plant.
The investment has since paid off, and TMMK now boasts numerous awards
for its success and achievements. Many
of the employees present for that first year of production are still working on
the Toyota team.
After having geared up with safety eyewear and wireless
headsets, we entered the plant floor and were immediately faced with the bustle
of an industrious work group. Robots
carrying racks of parts down aisles scooted along without any humans operating them. Conveyor lines that stacked two or three
levels high were carrying vehicle parts from one work space to the next. The scene reminded me of a busy anthill. Each worker knew exactly what he/she was
supposed to do, and they all were set on tasks at hand.
The tour was conducted from a golf-cart like shuttle with
passenger carts linked in a train configuration. The guide gave commentary from the front car
as we sped down the inter-factory interstate.
As we moved, workers on tricycles with trailers (maintenance workers) and
forklift operators passed by. My most
immediate observation outside of the visual described earlier was the sound
surrounding me. A sort of mechanical rhythm
filled the air as presses stamped and welds were set. Despite so much busyness, the plant was very
clean and little clutter was seen outside of the workspaces. Natural light came through narrow sunroof
windows above, and the ventilation system kept the air clean. Overhead, giant industrial fans kept the air
moving. Throughout all parts of the
plant, signs indicating safety requirements and potential dangers were posted. The cleanliness of the plant may be
attributed to the responsibility each worker seemed to take in maintaining that
state of things. Our tour was ending as
the workday ended, and as the production lines slowed to a halt, many of the
workers immediately set out with brooms to sweep and cloths to wipe down dirty
machines. Nobody appeared above the
task.
Our tour of the production process began by the shipping
docks where giant rolls of domestically produced steel were brought into the
plant directly off the backs of semi trailers.
100% of all steel supplied to TMMK comes from North American
sources. From this point on, the steel
is unrolled, flattened, and treated to prevent rust. In that same line, the strips are stamped and
cut into car body panels and components.
These parts are all produced only on demand. Toyota operates under a “pull” methodology
where cars are produced only when/if ordered by a customer. Toyota never produces a set quota of cars base
on predictions and they do not keep large inventories. This is a cost saving strategy that has
worked very well for Toyota and has since been adopted by many other auto
manufacturers as a key production strategy.
Steel Rolls |
As hoods, floor pans, and other panels are stamped out and
stacked on racks, robots carts will carry loaded racks to places on the
production line were the cars are being assembled. The first assembly stage is welding, where
the stamped and cut panels are placed on jigs and welded by automated robotic
arms. It was exhilarating to see just how
quickly the robots put together the body-in-white. In this same line, a production worker would
pull a body off the line and check each spot weld with a punch and hammer. He would go through thousands of these spot
welds each day to ensure that no robot was in error when placing the critical
welds on the car body. Similarly, in
other parts of the production line, quality checks were very routine. In the gas tank division, multiple tanks are
cut open daily to ensure the insides of the tank are leak free and clean. Toyota places a very large emphasis on
quality, and this was evident in the philosophy of their production process.
The Toyota Production System (TPS) is very well known by all
manufacturers worldwide and is often brought up in core engineering classes at
many accredited schools. The idea
involves concepts such as “Just in Time” manufacturing and the “Pull System”
for manufacturing parts. Japanese terms
accompany many components of this production process. One key component of the TPS is the concept
of “Jidoka” which is the ability for each line worker to ensure product
quality. Along the entire production
line is what is known as an “Andon” cord.
If any worker notices a serious quality issue or error, they can simply
pull this cord to stop the entire assembly line. This empowers each employee to take immediate
action on production issues without needing to consult a supervisor first. Also helpful is the ability of workers to
communicate needs to one another. A
light board (the key component of the Andon system) is located in the aisle-way
of all production lines and contains a grid indicating various status points of
a line. Line workers can simply indicate
if they are low on parts or in need of assistance by signaling with a light on
the board.
Light Board System |
Each production line team, headed by a team
leader/supervisor, works as an independent “producer” for the next “customer”
in the assembly process. Those who work
in dashboard assembly are therefore customers of the dashboard manufacturing
line. Quality is then ensured by
focusing on producing quality products for the in-house consumers on the
production line.
Another big part of the TPS is the concept of “Kaizen” which
means bringing about continuous improvement.
This hinges on employees rather than specialists. When employees see problems or areas for
improvements, they can communicate these thoughts to their supervisors at team
meetings. Many of these ideas then make
their way to Japan for adoption at the main headquarters. Nearly 95% of ideas sent from production line
workers are adopted, empowering many employees to take ownership of their
jobs. Toyota knows that the people who
can identify problems the quickest are the ones actually working on the
floor. The neat part was seeing the
system working effectively. As we drove
through the plant, we saw many modules where plant teams would frequently meet
and discuss goals and company initiatives.
White boards and bulletin boards were also found in these modules so
that ideas could be shared and communicated within each work group. It was also fun to see many of these modules
had nearby break rooms or recreation spaces filled with foosball and pool
tables. This “fun” environment
communicated that many employees enjoy their job and that Toyota understands
the needs of its employees. Most line
workers work an eight hour day by working four independent two-hour
shifts. Each shift is on a different job
so as to cut down on the monotony of a particular task. The morning and afternoon shifts are split
with 15 minutes breaks. A 45 minute
lunch break is provided for all plant employees. Only two eight hour production line shifts
work throughout the day. Maintenance
workers are present twenty four hours a day.
The most impressive part of the tour experience was seeing
just how efficiently a car could be produced from start to finish. Stamping, body weld, paint, plastics, power
train, car assembly, and final inspection are all completed within one 20 hour
cycle. Toyota takes giant coils of raw
steel and forms them into a polished Camry within a single day. That to me is astounding. And in spite of this production speed,
quality is actively controlled and monitored by a production system which is
ranked one of the highest in the industry.
Each employee seemed to have a vested interest in the production of
quality products too. Even as our tour
caravan moved between production lines within this giant factory “city”, line
workers would smile and wave to us as we passed by. It was very obvious that they had a lot of
pride in the work they were doing.
We left the plant tour thoroughly impressed and certainly
with a much clearer idea of how an American auto manufacturing plant operates. What might have been unique about this
experience was that the American plant was owned by a Japanese company and ran
under Japanese production concepts. It
would be very interesting now to see how an American car company’s
manufacturing plant would differ. In any
case, I will have the opportunity to see how a Germany car company operates a
plant in the Czech Republic in just a few short weeks. I will also be in Munich for two days prior
to the graduate seminar starting. While
in Munich, I will be taking a plant tour of BMW’s manufacturing facility with
some fellow MBA students. I also look
forward to seeing how that plant’s operations are similar/different than the
other two.
No comments:
Post a Comment